Text size
Line height
Text spacing
Skip available courses
Last modified: Monday, 19 January 2026, 10:17 AMAvailable courses
AI Responsibility Capstone: Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Services
Course modified date: 13 February 2026
Course Type
Executive Leadership | AI Governance Capstone Simulation
Institution
C-Lab Institute
Overview
Artificial Intelligence in the public sector carries consequences far beyond operational efficiency — it shapes citizens’ rights, trust, and democratic legitimacy.
This capstone is the culminating stage of the C-Lab Institute AI Responsibility pathway. Participants are placed in a high-stakes government decision scenario involving the deployment of an AI system for public welfare eligibility assessment.
Under political, legal, and societal pressure, leaders must determine whether the system should proceed, pause, or be redesigned.
This is not a theoretical exercise.
It is a governance decision under scrutiny.
Capstone Objective
Participants will act as Chair of an AI Governance Committee and prepare a formal Ministerial Advisory Memorandum recommending a responsible course of action.
The capstone evaluates the leader’s ability to:
• Identify public, ethical, and regulatory risks
• Assess algorithmic fairness and due process implications
• Design oversight and accountability structures
• Propose audit, transparency, and appeal mechanisms
• Make a defensible go / no-go deployment recommendation
What Participants Must Submit
A structured 1,800–2,000 word Ministerial Governance Brief including:
-
Risk Identification
-
Strategic risk
-
Legal exposure
-
Bias and fairness risk
-
Public trust impact
-
Reputational implications
-
-
Governance Framework Proposal
-
Oversight committee structure
-
Human-in-the-loop controls
-
Transparency and explainability standards
-
Vendor accountability measures
-
Appeals and redress mechanisms
-
-
Final Recommendation
-
Deploy / Modify / Pause / Withdraw
-
Conditions required for responsible deployment
-
-
Reflection
“What does responsible AI leadership require when public trust is at stake?”
Assessment Criteria
Submissions are evaluated on:
• Depth of Risk Analysis
• Governance Design Quality
• Ethical & Public Accountability Awareness
• Decision Logic & Justification
• Strategic Clarity
Award
🏅 300 Responsibility Coins
📜 C-Lab Institute AI Responsibility Capstone Certificate
Primary 3R Dimension: Responsibility (Do)
Progression Path: Leader → Fellow
Closing Statement
AI Responsibility is not about avoiding risk.
It is about governing risk with clarity, courage, and accountability.
In public service, trust is the ultimate metric.
- Enrolled students: There are no students enrolled in this course.
AI Responsibility Capstone: Algorithmic Personalisation & Privacy Risk - Hotel Case Study
Course modified date: 13 February 2026
Course Type
Executive Leadership | AI Governance Capstone Simulation
Institution
C-Lab Institute
Overview
Artificial Intelligence in hospitality does not only personalise experiences — it reshapes guest privacy, trust, and brand integrity.
This capstone is the culminating stage of the C-Lab Institute AI Responsibility pathway. Participants are placed in a global hotel group that has deployed an AI-powered personalisation engine.
The system tracks guest preferences, spending patterns, sentiment data, and behavioural analytics to optimise pricing, room allocation, and targeted marketing.
Revenue is rising.
Customer engagement appears stronger.
However:
• Guests are unaware of the extent of behavioural profiling
• Regulators are reviewing cross-border data transfers
• A media investigation has raised concerns about “surveillance hospitality”
• A data leak has exposed sensitive guest patterns
The board must determine whether the AI system should continue, be redesigned, scaled globally, or suspended.
This is not a marketing decision.
It is a governance decision involving privacy, compliance, and brand trust.
Capstone Objective
Participants will act as Chair of the AI & Data Governance Committee and prepare a formal Board Advisory Memorandum recommending a responsible course of action.
The capstone evaluates the leader’s ability to:
• Identify privacy, data, and consumer protection risks
• Assess cross-border data transfer exposure
• Evaluate ethical limits of personalisation
• Design governance and oversight controls
• Propose transparency and consent frameworks
• Make a defensible deployment / restriction recommendation
What Participants Must Submit
A structured 1,800–2,000 word AI Governance Brief including:
Risk Identification
Data privacy risk
Regulatory exposure (GDPR / PDPA / global compliance)
Consumer transparency gaps
Algorithmic profiling risk
Cross-border data transfer implications
Cybersecurity vulnerabilities
Brand and reputational impact
Governance Framework Proposal
AI oversight committee structure
Clear data ownership & accountability
Consent and opt-out mechanisms
Data minimisation policies
Vendor & third-party accountability
Bias monitoring & fairness controls
Incident response and breach escalation protocol
Deployment Decision
Continue / Modify / Restrict / Pause
Conditions required for responsible personalisation
12-month governance and compliance roadmap
Reflection
“When does personalisation become intrusion — and how should responsible leaders draw that line?”
Assessment Criteria
Submissions are evaluated on:
• Depth of Privacy & Regulatory Analysis
• Governance Architecture Design
• Ethical Sensitivity to Consumer Trust
• Strategic Brand Risk Awareness
• Clarity and Defensibility of Recommendation
Award
🏅 300 Responsibility Coins
📜 C-Lab Institute AI Responsibility Capstone Certificate
- Enrolled students: There are no students enrolled in this course.
AI Responsibility Capstone: Governance Under Pressure - Finance Case Study
Course modified date: 13 February 2026
Course Type
Executive Leadership | AI Governance Capstone Simulation
Institution
C-Lab Institute
Overview
Artificial Intelligence in financial services does not simply optimise decisions — it influences credit access, risk assessment, fraud detection, and market stability.
This capstone is the culminating stage of the C-Lab Institute AI Responsibility pathway. Participants are placed in a regional financial institution preparing to deploy an AI-powered credit risk and customer profiling model.
The model promises:
• Faster loan approvals
• Improved fraud detection
• Higher profitability
However:
• Early testing suggests possible demographic bias
• Model explainability is limited
• Regulators are increasing scrutiny of algorithmic decision-making
• Consumer advocacy groups are demanding transparency
• Investors are pushing for rapid rollout
The board must determine whether to proceed, delay, restrict, or redesign the deployment.
This is not a data science decision.
It is a governance decision under regulatory and reputational pressure.
Capstone Objective
Participants will act as Chair of the AI Risk & Governance Committee and prepare a formal Board Advisory Memorandum recommending a responsible course of action.
The capstone evaluates the leader’s ability to:
• Identify strategic, regulatory, and consumer risks
• Assess model bias and explainability concerns
• Evaluate compliance exposure under financial regulations
• Design oversight and accountability mechanisms
• Propose monitoring, testing, and audit frameworks
• Make a defensible go / no-go deployment recommendation
What Participants Must Submit
A structured 1,800–2,000 word Executive Governance Brief including:
Risk Identification
Strategic risk
Regulatory compliance exposure
Model bias and fairness risk
Explainability and transparency gaps
Consumer protection implications
Financial stability concerns
Reputational and investor risk
Governance Framework Proposal
AI risk oversight committee structure
Defined accountability across business, risk, and IT
Model validation and independent audit process
Human-in-the-loop review for high-risk decisions
Ongoing monitoring and model drift controls
Incident reporting and regulator notification protocol
Customer disclosure and appeal mechanisms
Deployment Decision
Deploy / Deploy with Safeguards / Delay & Strengthen Controls / Suspend
Conditions required for responsible deployment
12-month governance and compliance roadmap
Reflection
“What does responsible AI leadership require when financial performance and regulatory accountability collide?”
Assessment Criteria
Submissions are evaluated on:
• Depth of Regulatory & Risk Analysis
• Governance Framework Strength
• Balance Between Innovation and Prudence
• Clarity of Strategic Decision
• Ethical and Consumer Protection Awareness
Award
🏅 300 Responsibility Coins
📜 C-Lab Institute AI Responsibility Capstone Certificate
- Enrolled students: There are no students enrolled in this course.
AI Responsibility Capstone: Clinical AI Under Regulatory Scrutiny - Healthcare Case Study
Course modified date: 13 February 2026
Artificial Intelligence in healthcare does not merely optimise processes — it influences diagnoses, treatment pathways, and patient safety.
This capstone is the culminating stage of the C-Lab Institute AI Responsibility pathway. Participants are placed in a healthcare institution that has deployed a clinical AI system to assist with diagnostic decision-making.
Initial results showed efficiency gains.
However, new evidence suggests possible bias across demographic groups, incomplete validation studies, and regulatory review concerns.
- Media scrutiny is increasing.
- Regulators are requesting documentation.
- Clinicians are divided in opinion.
The hospital board must determine whether the system should continue, be restricted, redesigned, or suspended.
This is not a technical audit.
It is a governance decision involving patient safety and public trust.
In healthcare, AI responsibility is not optional.
It is a clinical obligation.
Technology may assist decision-making —
but governance protects patients.Without governance, innovation can harm.
With governance, innovation heals.
- Enrolled students: There are no students enrolled in this course.
AI Responsibility Capstone: Scaling Fast vs Governing Smart - SME tech start-up
Course modified date: 13 February 2026
About the Course
Course Type
Executive Leadership | AI Governance Capstone Simulation
Institution
C-Lab Institute
Overview
Artificial Intelligence in fast-scaling tech start-ups moves at the speed of innovation — but governance often struggles to keep up.
This capstone is the culminating stage of the C-Lab Institute AI Responsibility pathway. Participants are placed in a high-growth SME technology company that has rapidly deployed an AI-powered product now facing customer complaints, investor scrutiny, and emerging regulatory risk.
Revenue is accelerating.
Media attention is rising.
Governance controls are minimal.
The leadership team must decide whether to:
Scale aggressively,
Slow down and redesign safeguards,
Or restructure governance before further deployment.
This is not a theoretical discussion.
It is a board-level decision under pressure.
Capstone Objective
Participants will act as Chair of the AI Governance & Risk Committee and prepare a formal Board Advisory Memorandum recommending a responsible scaling strategy.
The capstone evaluates the leader’s ability to:
• Identify commercial, regulatory, and reputational risks
• Assess data governance and model integrity weaknesses
• Evaluate bias, security, and safety exposure
• Design scalable oversight and accountability structures
• Propose testing, monitoring, and incident response mechanisms
• Make a defensible scale / pause / redesign recommendation
What Participants Must Submit
A structured 1,800–2,000 word Executive Governance Brief including:
Risk Identification
Strategic risk
Regulatory exposure
Data governance gaps
Bias and fairness risk
Model reliability concerns
Cybersecurity vulnerabilities
Investor and reputational risk
Governance Framework Proposal
Board oversight structure
Defined AI accountability roles
Human-in-the-loop controls
Pre-deployment testing standards
Ongoing monitoring & model audit
Incident reporting and escalation process
Vendor and third-party accountability
Transparency & customer disclosure measures
Scaling Decision
Scale Immediately / Scale with Conditions / Pause & Redesign
Conditions required for responsible scaling
Clear 12-month governance roadmap
Reflection
“What does responsible AI leadership require when growth pressure conflicts with governance discipline?”
Assessment Criteria
Submissions are evaluated on:
• Depth of Risk Analysis
• Practicality of Governance Design
• Commercial & Ethical Balance
• Clarity of Scaling Decision Logic
• Executive-Level Strategic Judgement
Award
🏅 300 Responsibility Coins
📜 C-Lab Institute AI Responsibility Capstone Certificate
Primary 3R Dimension: Responsibility (Do)
Progression Path: Leader → Fellow
- Enrolled students: There are no students enrolled in this course.
AI Responsibility for Leaders: AI Governance & Responsible Deployment for Leaders
Course modified date: 12 February 2026
Course Type
Executive Leadership | Governance & Responsible AI Deployment
Institution
C-Lab Institute
Overview
Artificial Intelligence does not fail because of poor models — it fails because organisations lack governance.
This course is the second stage in the C-Lab Institute AI Leadership pathway. After establishing AI Readiness, leaders must now design and oversee governance systems that ensure AI is deployed responsibly, safely, and sustainably.
Participants will learn how to:
• Identify AI risk across strategic, operational, legal, and reputational domains
• Design governance frameworks aligned with global standards
• Implement oversight, accountability, and lifecycle controls
• Establish policy, audit, and monitoring mechanisms
• Make informed go / no-go deployment decisions
This course focuses on executive judgement and institutional responsibility — not technical coding.
By the end of the programme, leaders will be equipped to answer the critical question:
“Can AI be trusted in my organisation?”
Primary 3R Dimension: Responsibility (Do)
Progression Path: Practitioner → Leader
- Teacher: Dr. Patrick Chin
- Enrolled students: There are no students enrolled in this course.
AI Readiness for Leaders: Assessing Organisational Preparedness
Course start date: 18 February 2026
Here is the AI Readiness course write-up, aligned to your requested format and consistent with the C-Lab Institute leadership progression framework
C-Lab Institute AI Leadership L…
.
About the Course
Course Type
Executive Leadership | AI Strategy & Organisational Readiness
Institution
C-Lab Institute
Overview
Artificial Intelligence does not fail because of poor technology — it fails because leadership is unprepared.
AI Readiness for Leaders is the foundational stage in the C-Lab Institute AI Leadership pathway. Before governance, deployment, or innovation can occur, leaders must first build clarity, literacy, and strategic judgement.
This programme equips executives to evaluate whether their organisation is truly prepared for AI adoption — culturally, operationally, and strategically.
Participants will learn how to:
• Assess organisational AI maturity and capability gaps
• Distinguish AI opportunity from AI hype
• Understand foundational AI concepts without technical complexity
• Identify strategic use cases aligned to business outcomes
• Recognise early governance and risk considerations
• Develop a structured AI Readiness roadmap
This course is designed for decision-makers — not engineers.
It builds executive confidence before investment and deployment decisions are made.
By the end of the programme, leaders will be able to answer the critical question:
“Is my organisation truly ready for AI?”
Primary 3R Dimension: Readiness (Know)
Progression Path: Explorer → Practitioner
- Teacher: Dr. Patrick Chin
- Enrolled students: 2
AI for High-Speed Rail Business & Operations Excellence
Course modified date: 12 February 2026
Are you ready to lead the next generation of transport infrastructure? High-Speed Rail (HSR) is evolving rapidly, shifting from traditional manual control to intelligent, data-driven ecosystems.
AI for High-Speed Rail Business & Operations Excellence is a specialized program designed for professionals who want to master the business and operational side of this transformation. This is not a train engineering course. Instead, it focuses entirely on how to run, manage, optimize, and govern HSR systems using Artificial Intelligence.
Whether you are looking to optimize complex timetables, predict asset failures before they happen, or navigate the ethics of cross-border data, this course bridges the gap between technical AI potential and real-world railway reality.
- Teacher: Christine Sandy
- Enrolled students: 2
